KRISHNAKANT RAGHUNATH BIBHAVNEKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

The Supreme Court held that an acquitted government servant is not automatically entitled to all consequential benefits, including back wages, upon reinstatement after suspension. The Court emphasized that the purpose of prosecution is to maintain public integrity and discipline, and granting full benefits post-acquittal could undermine these objectives. The ruling clarified that while reinstatement is warranted, the disciplinary authority retains discretion regarding the entitlement to benefits based on the nature of the conduct leading to prosecution under Section 409 IPC.