Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-02-13

STATE OF TRIPURA vs SUDHIR RANJAN NATH

Citation / case number
SC 1992/84709
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF TRIPURA
Respondent
SUDHIR RANJAN NATH
Author
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
SUJATA V. MANOHAR B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Gauhati High Court's ruling that Rule 3 of the Transit Rules framed under Sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is illegal and ultravires the Constitution. The Court emphasized that the Indian Forest Act is a post-constitutional enactment applicable to Tripura, and the provisions of the Act are designed to protect forest wealth and ensure its proper utilization. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision, thereby maintaining the legality of the judgment against the State of Tripura's challenge.

STATE OF TRIPURA vs SUDHIR RANJAN NATH · Niyam