Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-02-20

M/S PROGRESSIVE FINANCERS, MADRAS vs THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MADRAS-1, MADRAS,

Citation / case number
SC 1981/63740
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S PROGRESSIVE FINANCERS, MADRAS
Respondent
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MADRAS-1, MADRAS,
Author
NANAVATI
Bench
G.T. NANAVATI S.C. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 184 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a partnership deed must clearly delineate the status of a minor partner. The Court found that the Income Tax Officer's rejection of the registration application was erroneous, as the partnership deed indicated that the minor was admitted only to the benefits of partnership, thus validating the partnership's registration. The Court upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision, allowing the firm to be registered as a partnership.

M/S PROGRESSIVE FINANCERS, MADRAS vs THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MADRAS-1, MADRAS, · Niyam