Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-08-08

TOMY JACOB KATTIKKARAN vs THOMAS MANJALY

Citation / case number
SC 1996/79557
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TOMY JACOB KATTIKKARAN
Respondent
THOMAS MANJALY
Author
M. K. MUKHERJEE
Bench
S. SAGHIR AHMAD M. K. MUKHERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the requirement of serving a notice within the prescribed period is crucial for maintaining a complaint. The Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent based on the finding that the appellant failed to serve the notice in time, which was a factual determination. However, the Court quashed the High Court's order setting aside the discharge of the appellant, as the evidence against him was insufficient to establish a prima facie case.

TOMY JACOB KATTIKKARAN vs THOMAS MANJALY · Niyam