Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-04-25

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. vs MANOHAR LAL MIRCHEA

Citation / case number
SC 1997/62068
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
Respondent
MANOHAR LAL MIRCHEA
Author
K. RAMASWAMY,G.T. NANAVATI,K.VENKATASWAMI
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY,G.T. NANAVATI,K.VENKATASWAMI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of amendments made to the Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules regarding retirement benefits, specifically Rule 4.2, which was challenged for violating Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court held that the retrospective application of the amended rules was arbitrary and unconstitutional, affirming the High Court's decision that the cut-off date of 26.10.60 was invalid. Consequently, the appeal by the State of Punjab was dismissed, upholding the rights of the respondent to claim benefits under the amended rules.

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. vs MANOHAR LAL MIRCHEA · Niyam