Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1997

Supreme Court of India · 1997-04-08

PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY vs K.G. SHARMA

Citation / case number
SC 1992/84716
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
Respondent
K.G. SHARMA
Author
G.T. NANAVATI K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.T. NANAVATI K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) qualifies as an 'industry' under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court upheld the Labour Court's decision that PRL is indeed an industry, referencing the precedent set in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa, which established that research activities can fall under the definition of industry. The Court affirmed the Labour Court's ruling that the respondent was entitled to back wages for the period he was wrongfully retired before the age of 60.

PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY vs K.G. SHARMA · Niyam