Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-09-30

U.P.S.R.T.CORPORATION, LUCKNOW. vs ANWAR AHMED .

Citation / case number
SC 1996/78332
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P.S.R.T.CORPORATION, LUCKNOW.
Respondent
ANWAR AHMED .
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that once a scheme under Section 100 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is approved and published, the right to ply stage carriages by private operators on the notified routes is frozen. The Court clarified that temporary permits cannot be granted to private operators in the notified area unless the scheme allows it, as per the proviso to Section 104 of the Act. The High Court's orders granting temporary permits were set aside, reinforcing the principle that the scheme's provisions must be adhered to strictly.

U.P.S.R.T.CORPORATION, LUCKNOW. vs ANWAR AHMED . · Niyam