SUVARAN RAJARAM BANDEKAR vs NARAYAN R. BANDEKAR

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the court's power to modify the terms of a consent decree, emphasizing that such modifications require the consent of both parties. The Court found that the respondents had complied with the payment schedule outlined in the consent decree, with only three future installments pending. The Court dismissed the appeals, holding that there were no sufficient grounds for interference with the High Court's order regarding compliance and the handover of R.C. books for vehicles.