Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-09-11

C.I.T.,MADURAI vs T V SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS

Citation / case number
SC 1993/89475
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.I.T.,MADURAI
Respondent
T V SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS
Author
SUHAS C. SEN B.P. JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
SUHAS C. SEN B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 23A of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, the Income Tax Officer is required to determine the minimum dividend a company should distribute based on separate statutory percentages for industrial (45%) and non-industrial (60%) profits. The Court found that the High Court erred in treating the profits of both segments as a single total income for all purposes. The appeal was allowed, affirming that the company was liable for additional super-tax on undistributed non-industrial profits, while the allocation of dividends for industrial profits was upheld.

C.I.T.,MADURAI vs T V SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS · Niyam