Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-09-24

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs SWAROPCHANDRA

Citation / case number
SC 1988/70867
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Respondent
SWAROPCHANDRA
Author
K. RAMASWAMY,K. VENKATASWAMI,G.B. PATTANAIK
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY,K. VENKATASWAMI,G.B. PATTANAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court analyzed the powers of the Divisional Forest Officer under the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969, particularly Sections 15, 19, and 22. The Court held that the High Court correctly determined that the Act does not provide for the confiscation of vehicles used for transporting specified forest produce, as the power of confiscation is not expressly stated in the Act. Consequently, the order of confiscation was deemed without authority of law, and the vehicle was ordered to be released.

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs SWAROPCHANDRA · Niyam