Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-09-11

M/S. GUJARAT MACHINERYMANUFACTURERS LTD. vs COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODA.

Citation / case number
SC 1984/68463
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. GUJARAT MACHINERYMANUFACTURERS LTD.
Respondent
COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODA.
Author
BHARUCHA S.P.
Bench
BHARUCHA S.P.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the classification of frit under Item 23-A(4) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, holding that the Collector's reclassification was valid but emphasized that a notice for recovery of short-levied duty, as mandated by Section 35A, was not issued to the appellants. The Court ruled that the recovery could only be made for the six months preceding the order, directing recalculation of the short levy accordingly. The outcome affirmed the Tribunal's decision while ensuring compliance with procedural requirements under the Act.

M/S. GUJARAT MACHINERYMANUFACTURERS LTD. vs COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODA. · Niyam