Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-23
M.S. PATIL, ASSTT. CONSERVATOR OFFORESTS, SOLARPUR (MAHARAS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.
- Citation / case number
- SC 1996/80589
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- M.S. PATIL, ASSTT. CONSERVATOR OFFORESTS, SOLARPUR (MAHARAS
- Respondent
- STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.
- Author
- G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
- Bench
- G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court addressed the issue of seniority between promotees and direct recruits in the context of service rules, specifically referencing the principles established in Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India. The Court held that the seniority of promotees must be determined from the date of their regular promotion, and that the quota rules were violated by promoting more individuals than allowed. The Court concluded that the earlier judgment was not vitiated by any error of law, affirming the established principles of seniority and recruitment quotas.