Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-23

M.S. PATIL, ASSTT. CONSERVATOR OFFORESTS, SOLARPUR (MAHARAS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1996/80589
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.S. PATIL, ASSTT. CONSERVATOR OFFORESTS, SOLARPUR (MAHARAS
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of seniority between promotees and direct recruits in the context of service rules, specifically referencing the principles established in Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India. The Court held that the seniority of promotees must be determined from the date of their regular promotion, and that the quota rules were violated by promoting more individuals than allowed. The Court concluded that the earlier judgment was not vitiated by any error of law, affirming the established principles of seniority and recruitment quotas.

M.S. PATIL, ASSTT. CONSERVATOR OFFORESTS, SOLARPUR (MAHARAS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. · Niyam