Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-08

STATE OF ORISSA vs BHARAT CHANDRA SAHU

Citation / case number
SC 1996/1939
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF ORISSA
Respondent
BHARAT CHANDRA SAHU
Author
Saghir Ahmad
Bench
S. SAGHIR AHMAD KULDIP SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the charge under Section 494 IPC, as the offence is non-cognizable and requires a complaint by an aggrieved person as per Section 198(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court clarified that the police could not take cognizance of the offence without a proper complaint, thus reinstating the charge under Section 494 IPC while upholding the charge under Section 498A IPC. The judgment of the High Court was set aside to the extent of the quashing of the charge under Section 494 IPC.

STATE OF ORISSA vs BHARAT CHANDRA SAHU · Niyam