Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-11

UNION OF INDIA vs PUNNILAL .

Citation / case number
SC 1995/16961
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
PUNNILAL .
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the authority under the Payment of Wages Act lacks jurisdiction to entertain a claim for back-wages when the claimant has previously sought a declaration for promotion without including a claim for back-wages, as per Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court found that the respondent's earlier suit for promotion did not encompass a claim for back-wages, thus barring the subsequent claim. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order of the authority under the Payment of Wages Act was set aside.

UNION OF INDIA vs PUNNILAL . · Niyam