Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-01

S. VINOD KUMAR vs U O I

Citation / case number
SC 1995/13862
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. VINOD KUMAR
Respondent
U O I
Author
B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
K.S. PARIPOORNAN B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reaffirmed that Article 16(4) does not allow for reservations in promotions, as established in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, and clarified that existing reservations shall remain effective for five years from the date of that judgment. The Court held that while concessions and relaxations for reserved categories in promotions are permissible, they must not compromise administrative efficiency. It emphasized that lower qualifying marks or evaluation standards for promotions are impermissible, although some relaxation may be allowed in direct recruitment for OBCs, SCs, and STs, consistent with administrative efficiency.

S. VINOD KUMAR vs U O I · Niyam