Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-25

UNION OF INDIA vs VIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL SHAH

Citation / case number
SC 1994/72179
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
VIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL SHAH
Author
G.T. NANAVATI S.C. AGRAWAL
Bench
G.T. NANAVATI S.C. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether it is permissible to club vacancies from multiple years when preparing the select list for promotion to the Indian Administrative Service from the State Civil Service. The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision that such clubbing is not permissible under the Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulation, 1955, specifically referencing Regulation 5, which mandates separate select lists for each year. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the respondent, affirming that the selection process must adhere to the annual preparation of lists to ensure fairness.

UNION OF INDIA vs VIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL SHAH · Niyam