Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-11

GURUBIPIN SINGH vs CHONGTHAM MANIHAR SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 1994/17725
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GURUBIPIN SINGH
Respondent
CHONGTHAM MANIHAR SINGH
Author
B.L. HANSARIA G.N. RAY
Bench
B.L. HANSARIA G.N. RAY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while addressing a complaint under Sections 465, 468, and 420 IPC, held that the allegations made against the appellant did not constitute an abuse of process of the court. The Court found that a fresh cause of action had arisen due to the appellant's repeated assertions in a later publication, thus rejecting the argument of staleness. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the revision petition, affirming that the complaint was valid and did not warrant quashing.

GURUBIPIN SINGH vs CHONGTHAM MANIHAR SINGH · Niyam