Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-10

BALLU & ORS. vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 1988/70888
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BALLU & ORS.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Author
M.K. MUKHERJEE
Bench
S.P. KURDUKAR M.K. MUKHERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Attar Chand and Jaggar, affirming the Designated Court's findings. The Court noted that the prosecution established the presence of the accused at the crime scene with weapons, and the confessions made by one of the appellants were admissible under the law. The Court also confirmed the conviction of Raj Kumar under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, and Section 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the convictions.

BALLU & ORS. vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam