Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-01

LAXMANRAO BAPURAO JADHAV & ANR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1988/70866
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
LAXMANRAO BAPURAO JADHAV & ANR.
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in invalidating the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, citing that the authorized officer's satisfaction regarding public purpose was not a prerequisite for the government's conclusion post-enquiry under Section 5-A. The Court clarified that Section 3-A empowers officers to conduct surveys to determine land necessity for public purposes, thus affirming the validity of the government's actions. The Court ultimately set aside the High Court's ruling, reinstating the land acquisition process.

LAXMANRAO BAPURAO JADHAV & ANR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. · Niyam