Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-10-28

A.A. MULLA AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69894
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.A. MULLA AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK G.N. RAY
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK G.N. RAY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the appellants under Section 409 IPC and Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove misappropriation of gold biscuits. The Court addressed the applicability of Section 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, affirming that the appellants could not be tried for the same facts again. The judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing the Criminal Writ Petition was affirmed, maintaining the lower court's decisions regarding the convictions under the Customs Act and Gold Control Act.

A.A. MULLA AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. · Niyam