Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-11-19

STATE OF U.P. vs VINAY KUMAR JAIN

Citation / case number
SC 1996/78515
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
VINAY KUMAR JAIN
Author
B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
K.S. PARIPOORNAN B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Petting Tax Act, 1979, particularly Section 3 and Rule 24-A of the Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Betting Tax Rules, 1981, regarding the levy of entertainment tax. The Court upheld the Allahabad High Court's decision that the District Magistrate could not deny a cinema proprietor's request to reduce seating capacity and opt for a composition scheme based solely on previous declarations. The Court ruled that the reasons for denial, including potential revenue loss, were irrelevant, affirming the High Court's judgment.

STATE OF U.P. vs VINAY KUMAR JAIN · Niyam