Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-11-20

COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF D.R. vs C.M., OF THE STATE OF MAHARAHSTRA

Citation / case number
SC 1994/16411
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF D.R.
Respondent
C.M., OF THE STATE OF MAHARAHSTRA
Author
K.S. PARIPOORNAN B.P. JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
K.S. PARIPOORNAN B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Commission of Inquiry appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 does not preclude the government from prosecuting individuals responsible for the riots that occurred in Bombay in December 1992 and January 1993. The Court emphasized that the Commission is not a court of law and cannot adjudicate criminal liability. The Court overturned the Bombay High Court's dismissal of the writ petition, directing the government to carry out investigations and prosecute those responsible for the riots, thereby upholding the rule of law and human rights.

COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF D.R. vs C.M., OF THE STATE OF MAHARAHSTRA · Niyam