Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-11-05

SHANTINATH RAMU DANOLE & ANR. vs JAMBU RAMU DANOLE & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1984/68458
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHANTINATH RAMU DANOLE & ANR.
Respondent
JAMBU RAMU DANOLE & ORS.
Author
Faizan Uddin
Bench
FAIZAN UDDIN N.P. SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the plaintiffs' claim for partition under Section partition of the Hindu Succession Act, affirming their 2/3rd share in the ancestral property of deceased Ramubabu Danole. The Court found that the plaintiffs, Shantinath and Housabai, were legitimate heirs despite the defendant's claims of exclusivity based on alleged non-marriage. The Court ruled that the sale of property by the defendant during the pendency of the suit was not binding on the plaintiffs, thereby granting them their rightful share.

SHANTINATH RAMU DANOLE & ANR. vs JAMBU RAMU DANOLE & ORS. · Niyam