Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-11-07

SMT. TULSA BAI vs STARE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1980/63364
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. TULSA BAI
Respondent
STARE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision dismissing the appellant's suit for declaration of ownership of property, emphasizing that the burden of proof lies on the appellant to establish that the property was not a benami transaction. The Court noted that the evidence presented, including testimonies regarding the purchase price and financial transactions, was insufficient to prove her claim. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the appellant did not establish her ownership rights under the relevant legal principles.

SMT. TULSA BAI vs STARE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. · Niyam