Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-05-10

P. RATNAKAR RAO vs GOVT. OF A.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1996/65157
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. RATNAKAR RAO
Respondent
GOVT. OF A.P.
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision regarding GOMS No.54, which increased the compounding fee for violations under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court found that the discretion given to the State Government under Section 200 of the Act to specify compounding amounts is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court clarified that penalties under Section 194 are contingent upon conviction, and the compounding process is conditional on the accused's willingness, thus affirming the legality of the enhanced fees.

P. RATNAKAR RAO vs GOVT. OF A.P. · Niyam