Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-05-09

HUDA vs KEWAL KRISHAN GOEL

Citation / case number
SC 1995/16564
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HUDA
Respondent
KEWAL KRISHAN GOEL
Author
G.B. PATTANAIK
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Haryana Urban Development Authority could forfeit the earnest money deposited by allotees who requested a refund after initially accepting the allotment of residential plots. The Court held that the authority is entitled to forfeit only 10% of the total amount deposited until the request for cancellation is made, as per the High Court's directive. This ruling clarifies the limits of forfeiture in cases of non-acceptance of allotment under the relevant regulations.

HUDA vs KEWAL KRISHAN GOEL · Niyam