Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-05-07

DHANNALAL vs D.P. VIJAYVARGIYA

Citation / case number
SC 1995/15722
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DHANNALAL
Respondent
D.P. VIJAYVARGIYA
Author
SINGH N.P.
Bench
SINGH N.P.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh High Court erred in setting aside the Tribunal's order condoning the delay in filing the claim petition under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court clarified that while the new Act imposes a six-month limitation period for filing claims, it still allows for a twelve-month extension if sufficient cause is shown. The Court reinstated the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of allowing claimants the opportunity to seek compensation despite minor delays.

DHANNALAL vs D.P. VIJAYVARGIYA · Niyam