Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-05-02

SUKHDEO vs COMNR., AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI &ANR

Citation / case number
SC 1994/76190
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUKHDEO
Respondent
COMNR., AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI &ANR
Author
G.B. PATTNAIK K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
G.B. PATTNAIK K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the validity of the compulsory retirement of a government servant under Rule 65(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court held that the power to retire a government servant must be exercised in the public interest, specifically to enhance efficiency in public service. The Court found that the adverse remarks in the appellant's service record were insufficient to justify the retirement, as they did not reflect a lack of integrity or capability, leading to the quashing of the retirement order.

SUKHDEO vs COMNR., AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI &ANR · Niyam