Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-05-07

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs RAVINDRA

Citation / case number
SC 1993/62305
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Respondent
RAVINDRA
Author
ANAND, A.S. () (),THOMAS K.T. ,LAHOTI, R.C. ,HEGDE, N. SANTOSH ,VARIAVA, S.N.
Bench
ANAND, A.S. (DR.) (CJI),THOMAS K.T. ,LAHOTI, R.C. ,HEGDE, N. SANTOSH ,VARIAVA, S.N.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court directed that the interpretation of Section 34 of the CPC regarding 'the principal sum adjudged' requires consideration by a Constitution Bench. The Court noted that previous judgments, including Corporation Bank vs. D.S. Gouda and Bank of Baroda vs. Jagannath, did not adequately address the distinction between 'principal sum adjudged' and 'aggregate sum so adjudged' prior to the 1956 Amendment. The Court emphasized the need for an authoritative ruling on the borrower's liability to pay interest on the principal sum, including any interest that merges with it.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs RAVINDRA · Niyam