Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-03-12

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs LOUIS SHOPPE

Citation / case number
SC 1995/4280
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI
Respondent
LOUIS SHOPPE
Author
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that wooden furniture does not inherently qualify as 'handicrafts' under Notification No.76 of 1986 unless it meets specific criteria: (1) it must be predominantly handmade, and (2) it must possess substantial artistic ornamentation. The Court emphasized that authorities must evaluate furniture based on these criteria for all pending and future matters, thereby clarifying the standards for classification as handicrafts. The appeals were disposed of with directions to adhere to these principles without reopening past cases.

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs LOUIS SHOPPE · Niyam