Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-03-22

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs BABULAL BHARTIYA

Citation / case number
SC 1995/17675
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Respondent
BABULAL BHARTIYA
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary authority has the power to withhold payment of arrears of salary as a mode of punishment under the relevant service rules. The Court found that the charges against the respondent conductor were proved, and thus the disciplinary authority's decision to impose stoppage of increments and withhold salary was justified. The Court dismissed the civil suit, affirming that the civil court lacks jurisdiction to substitute the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority.

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs BABULAL BHARTIYA · Niyam