Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-03-22

UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH vs JOHNSON PAINTS AND VARNISH

Citation / case number
SC 1994/76149
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH
Respondent
JOHNSON PAINTS AND VARNISH
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the High Court's order directing the re-allotment of an industrial site under Rule 11-D of the Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Building) Rules, 1960. The Court held that the Estate Officer's refusal to retransfer the site was unjustified, as there was no evidence of third-party rights created by the original allottee, Kulraj Singh Paul. The Court confirmed the High Court's decision, emphasizing that the conditions for re-allotment were satisfied, thus allowing the appeal for re-allotment.

UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH vs JOHNSON PAINTS AND VARNISH · Niyam