Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-03-12

M. VENKATESWARLU vs GOVT. OF A.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 1994/11369
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. VENKATESWARLU
Respondent
GOVT. OF A.P. .
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Rule 22 of the A.P. General Rules concerning promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Court held that Rule 22 does not apply to carry forward vacancies for promotion or transfer, and that retrospective relaxation under Rule 47 is illegal. Consequently, the Full Bench's decision was upheld, affirming the dismissal of the Original Application (O.A.) challenging the promotion relaxation granted to the appellant.

M. VENKATESWARLU vs GOVT. OF A.P. . · Niyam