Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-03-11

STATE OF UP vs NAND KISHORE SHUKLA

Citation / case number
SC 1992/84697
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF UP
Respondent
NAND KISHORE SHUKLA
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of oral permission under Rule 24 of the U.P. Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1956, in the context of a government employee's removal from service. The Court held that the respondent's failure to obtain written permission for the sale and purchase of properties constituted a violation of the rules, leading to the upholding of his dismissal. The Court emphasized that adherence to procedural requirements is essential for maintaining discipline within government service.

STATE OF UP vs NAND KISHORE SHUKLA · Niyam