Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-07-15

SECRETARY (ESTT) RLY. BOARD vs D. FRANCIS PAUL

Citation / case number
SC 1996/65381
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SECRETARY (ESTT) RLY. BOARD
Respondent
D. FRANCIS PAUL
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Rule 2423-A of the Railway Establishment Manual II concerning the addition of qualifying service for pension computation. The Court held that the amendment to the rule, which added a proviso requiring specific provisions in recruitment rules, is prospective and does not apply to the petitioners who were appointed before the amendment. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing the petitioners' claims for additional qualifying service for pension purposes, affirming their entitlement under the pre-amendment rule.

SECRETARY (ESTT) RLY. BOARD vs D. FRANCIS PAUL · Niyam