Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-07-22

STATE OF M.P. vs BADRINARAYAN ACHARYA

Citation / case number
SC 1994/76223
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF M.P.
Respondent
BADRINARAYAN ACHARYA
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the M.P. Administrative Tribunal's decision regarding advance increments for government employees who underwent training at government expense was incorrect. The Court affirmed that as per the Finance Department's Memo No. 16333-CR-1892-IV dated 22.10.64, only those who trained at their own cost are eligible for two advance increments, while those trained at government expense are excluded. The Court upheld the validity of the cut-off date of October 22, 1964, and allowed the appeals, dismissing the Tribunal's orders.

STATE OF M.P. vs BADRINARAYAN ACHARYA · Niyam