Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-07-11

MEENAL EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR vs TRADERS AND AGENCIES

Citation / case number
SC 1994/16901
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MEENAL EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR
Respondent
TRADERS AND AGENCIES
Author
NANAVATI G.T.
Bench
NANAVATI G.T.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's right to evict the respondents from her flat under the Bombay Rent Act, emphasizing the necessity of proving 'reasonable and bona fide' requirement for personal occupation as per Section 13(1)(g) of the Act. The Court found that the appellant had sufficiently demonstrated her lack of alternative accommodation and the urgency of her need for the premises, thereby reversing the High Court's dismissal of her eviction suit. The judgment reinforced the principle that landlords must be able to establish their genuine need for the premises to succeed in eviction proceedings.

MEENAL EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR vs TRADERS AND AGENCIES · Niyam