SMT.DAROTHI CLARE PARREIRA & ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the notification under Section 10(3) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, which vested excess land in the State. The Court held that the competent authority's procedure was not flawed by any legal error, and since the land had already vested in the State, the appellants were not entitled to further opportunities. The Court also noted that the pending application under Section 21 did not invalidate the notification under Section 10(3).