R.C. CHAWLA vs STATE OF HARYANA .

The Supreme Court held that the appellant must comply with the conditions of allotment, specifically prohibiting the use of allotted residential premises for commercial purposes. The Court noted that the appellant had affirmed the cessation of commercial use as of January 2, 1996, and directed the respondents to verify this claim. Upon verification, the respondents were instructed to withdraw the resumption order against the appellant, thereby disposing of the appeal without costs.