Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-01-12

DR. K.R. LAKSHMANAN vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Citation / case number
SC 1986/60197
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DR. K.R. LAKSHMANAN
Respondent
STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Author
KULDIP SINGH
Bench
KULDIP SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the nature of horse racing in relation to the definitions of 'gambling' under Section 49-A of the Madras City Police Act, 1888, and Section 11 of the Madras Gaming Act, 1930. The Court held that horse racing involves an element of skill and is not merely a game of chance, thus distinguishing it from gambling as defined in the aforementioned statutes. Furthermore, the Court ruled that the Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986, aligns with the policy under Article 39(b) and (c) of the Constitution and is protected under Article 31(c), thereby upholding its validity against challenges under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

DR. K.R. LAKSHMANAN vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU · Niyam