Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-02-26

G. SUNDARESWARARAO vs GOVT. OF A.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1996/62343
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
G. SUNDARESWARARAO
Respondent
GOVT. OF A.P.
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition challenging the Administrative Tribunal's order regarding promotion to Senior Scientific Officer, affirming that Rule 4(b) of the A.P. Institute of Preventive Medicine Service Ad hoc Rules, which mandates five years of experience post-postgraduation, is valid and not ultra vires. The Court clarified that the legislative intent behind the rule is to ensure candidates possess necessary expertise, and the insistence on experience is justified. The Court held that the petitioner's case for promotion should be considered according to the existing rules.

G. SUNDARESWARARAO vs GOVT. OF A.P. · Niyam