Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-02-20

R.M.TEWARI, ADV. vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .

Citation / case number
SC 1995/28
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R.M.TEWARI, ADV.
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .
Author
JAGDISH SARAN VERMA
Bench
JAGDISH SARAN VERMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA Act), except for Section 22, while emphasizing the need for a Screening Committee to prevent misuse of its provisions. The Court mandated that both Central and State governments establish review committees to scrutinize TADA cases and ensure proper application of the law. The Court held that the Designated Court's dismissal of applications for withdrawal of charges under TADA, based solely on administrative recommendations, was erroneous, reinforcing the necessity of judicial oversight in such matters.

R.M.TEWARI, ADV. vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) . · Niyam