Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-02-09

U.P.RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM vs INDURE PVT.LTD. .

Citation / case number
SC 1992/84567
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P.RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM
Respondent
INDURE PVT.LTD. .
Author
K. Ramaswamy
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the applicability of Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, affirming that an arbitration agreement must be valid and binding for disputes to be arbitrable. The Court held that the draft agreement dated June 22, 1984, was not executed by the appellant, and thus, no binding arbitration agreement existed between the parties. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's order that had directed arbitration based on the disputed agreement.

U.P.RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM vs INDURE PVT.LTD. . · Niyam