Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-02-28

PHIROZE DINSHAW LAM vs U.O.I. .

Citation / case number
SC 1991/78426
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PHIROZE DINSHAW LAM
Respondent
U.O.I. .
Author
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed six Special Leave Petitions against a Bombay High Court order directing a complaint under Section 192 IPC for fabricating false evidence and Section 340 CrPC for initiating proceedings in the interests of justice. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the prima facie evidence warranted a trial for the alleged offenses under Sections 192 and 193 IPC. The petitions were dismissed, with two becoming infructuous due to the death of petitioners.

PHIROZE DINSHAW LAM vs U.O.I. . · Niyam