Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-02-27

GOVT OF TAMIL NADU vs P.A. MANICKAM

Citation / case number
SC 1985/67072
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GOVT OF TAMIL NADU
Respondent
P.A. MANICKAM
Author
BHARUCHA S.P.
Bench
BHARUCHA S.P.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the provisions of Fundamental Rule 56(d) regarding compulsory retirement must be strictly adhered to, and failure to refer an employee's case to the review committee as mandated by G.O.Ms. No.761 constitutes a violation of procedural requirements. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the respondent's compulsory retirement was invalid due to non-compliance with the review process, thereby treating the respondent as reinstated with consequential benefits. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of following established procedures in public service retirements.

GOVT OF TAMIL NADU vs P.A. MANICKAM · Niyam