Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-02-06

SMT. FIRDOSH FATIMA (SINCE DEAD) ETC. vs SMT. FIRDOSH BEGUM (DEAD) & ORS. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1977/61788
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. FIRDOSH FATIMA (SINCE DEAD) ETC.
Respondent
SMT. FIRDOSH BEGUM (DEAD) & ORS. ETC.
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 4 of the U.P. Amendment Act 33 of 1972, which abolishes appeals from judgments of a single High Court judge in writ jurisdiction concerning certain revenue and tenancy matters. The Court reaffirmed its earlier ruling in Hasinuddin Khan & Ors. vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, confirming that the legislative competence to enact such provisions falls under the State List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as the controversy was resolved by established precedent.

SMT. FIRDOSH FATIMA (SINCE DEAD) ETC. vs SMT. FIRDOSH BEGUM (DEAD) & ORS. ETC. · Niyam