Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-12-17

RAM GANESH TRIPATHI vs STATE OF U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1996/966
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM GANESH TRIPATHI
Respondent
STATE OF U.P.
Author
NANAVATI
Bench
G.T. NANAVATI K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of favoritism and nepotism in government appointments, particularly concerning the U.P. Palika (Centralised) Service Rules. It held that the government had violated Rule 20 by making ad hoc appointments instead of adhering to the mandated equal recruitment of direct recruits and promotees. The Court upheld the Allahabad High Court's decision to quash the promotions of ad hoc appointees and directed the government to prepare a seniority list in compliance with the Rules, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment practices.

RAM GANESH TRIPATHI vs STATE OF U.P. · Niyam