BLOOM DEKOR vs ARVIND B. SHETH .

The Supreme Court upheld the findings of the appellate court and the High Court regarding the landlord's eviction suit against the tenant. The court found that the tenant had not sub-let the premises as the partner in question was deemed a common partner and retained possession. The court emphasized the relevance of assessment orders and import licenses from 1962 to 1971, which supported the tenant's claim of legitimate business operations from the premises. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions.