Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-08-30

ABDUR RAHMAN vs ATHIFA BEGUM .

Citation / case number
SC 1995/16500
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ABDUR RAHMAN
Respondent
ATHIFA BEGUM .
Author
K. VENKATASWAMY K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. VENKATASWAMY K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing an appeal on merits under Order 41 Rule 17 CPC, which does not empower the court to do so in the absence of the appellants' counsel. The Court emphasized that the High Court should not have considered the merits of the case at that stage. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and remitted the matter back for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

ABDUR RAHMAN vs ATHIFA BEGUM . · Niyam