Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-08-09

HARI OM VERMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
SC 1994/76253
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARI OM VERMA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of seniority between Stenographers and Assistants under the relevant service rules. The Court held that Rule 3(1) and Rule 3(2) must be read together, clarifying that a Stenographer must complete specific training and qualifications to be considered for seniority over Assistants, regardless of pay scale. The Court upheld the High Court's decision favoring the respondents, affirming that the appellant's claim of seniority based solely on higher pay was not tenable.

HARI OM VERMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB · Niyam